The Importance of Ancestry (China)

Chinese were asked “How important for citizenship — in your opinion — is having ancestors from this country?”

Observations:
#1 — Upper-class Chinese youth are noticeably more “voelkisch” than their lower-class peers.
#2 — Korea and China stand in contrast to Germany and Poland, in whose case “Yes” skews lower class. I do not understand why this would be.
#3 — A caveat here: Chinese self-identified “upper-class” youth, at 8% of the sample, are too small to be socially-influential.

Among 100 Chinese Youth Answering “Yes”,
11 are Upper-Class (8% overall)
52 are Middle-Class (55% overall)
37 are Lower-Class (37% overall)
["Yes" skews moderately upper-class.]

#4 — Continuing from #3, class in this survey is based on self-identification. If almost everyone identifies as one class, the data is almost unusable: In Vietnam, e.g., 86% claim to be lower-class, so of little value.

#5 — An important technical issue: 24.5% of Chinese respondents answered “Don’t Know”, with “Don’t Knows” skewing towards the older. (Germany, Poland, and South-Korea recorded under 3% “Don’t-Knows”.) This creates the illusion that younger Chinese are saying “Yes” more often than older, which is not true.

Here are the stats with IDKs.

If dividing-out IDKs, over-50s say “Yes” 77% of the time, under-30s only 67% of the time. A lesson in statistical distortion.

QUESTION
Why does “Yes” skew towards upper-class in Oriental countries but skews lower-class among Europeans?

About these ads
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

10 Responses to The Importance of Ancestry (China)

  1. Duke says:

    Why does “Yes” skew towards upper-class in Oriental countries but skews lower-class among Europeans?

    Interesting question.

    It could be because the upper-class in Oriental countries are indigenous, racially and ethnically native to the countries. Whereas an alien element has played a major role in the upper-class in European countries and has promoted a cosmopolitan outlook.

  2. Pingback: Ancestry for Citizenship? (Thailand) | Hail To You

  3. Pingback: Ancestry for Citizenship (Norway) | Hail To You

  4. Hail says:

    Duke, you must be referring to “Political Correctness”. Some interesting research has speculated about why the high-IQ seem to be more politically-correct than the rest.

    The problem: Isn’t “PC” One-World-ism also influential in the Orient? This survey is from 2007, not 1957.
    We can see “PC” influence because the Oriental trend overall is towards “Ancestry is Not Important”. Their upper-classes are against this trend, and are becoming increasingly “voelkisch”.
    Why?

  5. Pingback: Is Ancestry Important for Citizenship? (World) | Hail To You

  6. ML says:

    The problem: Isn’t “PC” One-World-ism also influential in the Orient?

    Not the same phenomenon over there. Their numbers are too great, and their racial instincts too distinctive to succumb to Judeo-Western mind-rot. I think the simple answer here is that the lower classes are probably unhappy under one-party rule, are downtrodden, and identifying patriotism with the party, disavow belonging from glum disinterest or even in defiance; while the affluent, having succeeded under current rule, see foreigners as threatening the political status quo that has raised or sustains their estate. The Chinese peasantry has been disenfranchised for a very long time, and foreign presence in the villages and really everywhere except the most exclusive or likely places (global offices, tourist attractions, port cities) is negligible; again, then, we may be seeing the effect of a lack of “immunity” from lack of exposure. The issue has never been pushed on them, cannot be pushed them, as it has been on us. For lower-class Chinese it is pure abstraction — “What people with foreign ancestry?” For us, it is an existential crisis.

  7. Hail says:

    ML writes:
    For lower-class Chinese it is pure abstraction — “What people with foreign ancestry?” For us, it is an existential crisis.

    This is a very good point towards explaining China’s result.

  8. K says:

    In poorly rules countries with glaring inequalities like Thailand and China, the ruling elites encourage nationalism and ethnic chauvinism as a way to focus anger away from the ruling group and towards the outside world. A general rule is, the more messed up a country is, the more “proud” it’s people are, as a compensation. This attitude is massively encouraged by the elites in those countries.

    You might think, then, that the elites themselves remain cynically unaffected by this attitude even while they encourage it amongst the lower orders, but things don’t really work that way. People, even ruling elites, are rarely so deliberate and knowingly cynical. Instead, the elites little by little, without fully knowing what they do or why, create an atmosphere of chauvinism and ethnic nationalism, and a culture saturated with these ideas, guided by an instinct for self-preservation.

    • Hail says:

      Your theory holds up for Thailand and China, but how do you explain South-Korea’s similar result?


      Consider:
      — The older generation grew up with much greater inequality, and “voelkisch” sentiment skews lower-class.
      — The youngest generation grew up much wealthier and with much less inequality, yet “voelkisch” sentiment skews upper-class.

      Unfortunately, World Values Survey did not include Japan, which could be a “control”, an obviously well-run, non-polarized Oriental society.

  9. Hail says:

    Confirmation of my finding that degree of ethnic-identity among Orientals skews upper-class:

    “Asians with higher education levels have a higher ethnic identification (Xie and Goyette 1997) and are less likely to interracially marry”.

    (From An Analysis of the Racial Experiences of People of Asian/White Heritage, University of Southern California, 2007).

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s